Development of a trial of preventative treatments for those at risk of rheumatoid arthritis

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) case study
Aim
We aimed to develop a trial design for evaluating preventative interventions for people at risk of rheumatoid arthritis through the consultation of a Public Advisory Group.
Methods
We used online meetings, emails and a feedback form to interact with the 25 public contributors involved.
Involvement included
We involved public contributors in:
- developing grant application
- developing an online feedback form
- giving feedback on trial design issues
- designing a study of patient treatment preferences
- developing lay summary, preparation of PPI plans and role description
Best practice
Public contributors noted:
- an inclusive environment where they felt listened to and respected by the researchers
- clear emails and adequate notice were received
- researchers showed a genuine interest and motivation to improve the quality of PPIE in research
- received prompt feedback on impact of contributions from public contributors
Impact of PPIE
- Public contributors advised on the selection of outcome measures and recruitment of patient groups.
- They informed consent procedures for the trial which have been incorporated into the trial protocol.
- They suggested undertaking an additional treatment preference study which is being delivered alongside the trial.
- Manuscript was submitted to a scientific journal with 12 PPI co-authors.
Latest case studies

Development of a trial of preventative treatments…
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) case study Aim We aimed to develop a…

Exploring the expectations, needs and concerns of…
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) case study Aim We aimed to incorporate the…